The Republic must be restored.

April 29, 2007

screechingrats!

Tom Paine wrote that “these are the times that try mens souls,” and the time is apt for those to be repeated often and loudly. The basic premise of government, as realized by Hobbes, Locke and other Enlightenment thinkers was that government was a contract: the people gave up certain rights (such as absolute control of all their wealth and profit and a the right to mete out justice) in return for the government being not merely derived from the consent of the governed, but as an agent for the mutual protection of the people under whom the government was established.

The Divine Right of Kings, of Might Makes Right, and that government is an oligarchy set up to maintain and increase the power and wealth of a few is long passed in theory. But these days, here at the dawn of the Twenty-first Century, a new rise of a tyranny masquerading as a Security State. Cloaked in a flag dripping blood from the innocent spewed out by the acts of a few religious fanatics, holding a Bible in one hand and the threat of peine fort et dure along with the threat of indefinite detention with no due process or even our ancient right of habeus corpus, a man with little wit and slim to nothing to recommend him alongside his cabal of toadies and henchmen has been allowed to ride roughshod over our entire Republic.

We find ourselves embroiled in another Asian Adventure, after having failed to learn our lesson from the Vietnamese Fiasco in Iraq. Iraq! A state which was our ally against the Iranians after their Islamic Revolution! Iraq! A state which had not threatened any of its neighbors save the decadent al Sabbah tyranny of Kuwait for over ten years. Yes, that Iraq.

Why? We still do not know the whole truth. Every reason offered has been proven to either be a lie or changed. After the 19 religious fanatics from ARABIA not Iraq flew airplanes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon and allegedly aimed for the Capitol itself, “everything changed” according to the official account of this Administration.

Indeed, it did, as we were set back further in our quest for a government by, for, and of the people in one fell swoop with a rubber stamp Congress and a tyrant in the White House and another at the Naval Observatory in the city of Washington.

Perhaps we are saddled with the nincompoop Bush and the evil Cheney and Chertoff until 2009, but they can be thwarted at every move by a strong Democratic Congress and a handful of Independents and Republicans who can keep additional spread of the cancer of cronyism, backslapping and lust for absolute power, the Constitution and our contract be damned!

Now is the time for the people to stand firm and speak out! Are you as tired of being in a civil war as am I? Are you sick of having dissent equated as treason? Do you want the Constitution restored? Then erect your verbal barricades and arm yourselves with the truth and then join the battle to save the Republic by restoring Constitutional Rule to our nation.


An Open Letter to George W. Bush and the People of the United States

September 25, 2006

It was Tom Paine who began Common Sense with a simple proclamation that “These are the times which try mens souls.” Such could not be more true now than when Mr. Paine of blessed memory wrote them over 200 years previous. Our souls are sorely tried, sir, by the current stream of thought and action coming from your White House (the author is loathe to call the building at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC, our White House).

Sir, your administration is an utter failure. You sought revanche against a small band of religious fanatics and have instead of delivering them to the hands of justice, wrought havok upon the nation which harbored them and upon another independent republic which you and your administration used as a pretext to destroy. You and you alone played guitar and ate birthday cake while your own ministers worried about how far to roll up their sleeves or else ignored pleas while a city drowned. Any man with a sense of honor should have offered his resignation to the Congress over a year ago. You have not. Instead of the proverbial roses and candies being tossed to our troops in Baghdad, we find them cannon fodder for a warped neo-conservative worldview.

You place untold men and youths into a foreign detention center out of communication with their families, legal representation or even a mechanism for trying them for their alleged crimes. Your Department of Justice kidnapped a citizen of a close ally of the United States while en route to his home from a family vacation to a third country where he was tortured and offer no explaination for this act. In former times, this ally might consider it an act bordering upon an undeclared act of war.

Your administration is attempting to weasel its way through the Constitution, basic human rights under the UN Universal Declaration, and the common sense of decency as understood by most people in the world by finding an apology for torture — agressive interrogation — non-fatal physical discomfort — or whatever you may call it. The world thought that the last public outrage over legal torture had ended before Voltaire drew his last breath, but such is not the case.

Your Secretary of Defense, one Donald Rumsfeld, is obviously incompotent in directing a war of any magnitude. The BBC reported the following this very evening, the 24th of September, 2006 regarding the “leak” of a classified document that surmised that the invasion and occupation of Iraq was in fact, abetting the “terrorism” which you so loudly decry:

Last Updated: Sunday, 24 September 2006, 17:19 GMT 18:19 UK

The BBC’s defence correspondent Rob Watson says this is not the first time the US intelligence community has said that the war in Iraq has made the problem of Islamist extremism worse.

Indeed it had warned that might happen even before the US-led invasion in 2003.

Pakistan man waving Osama Bin Laden poster
Many have been inspired by al-Qaeda chief Osama Bin Laden
But, our correspondent says, this latest finding, known as a National Intelligence Estimate, is the most comprehensive report yet, based on the considered analysis of all 16 of the US intelligence agencies.

According to the New York Times, which has spoken to officials who have either read it, or been involved in drafting it, the report says the invasion and occupation of Iraq has spawned a new generation of Islamic radicalism that has spread across the globe.

[snip]

It reportedly concludes that, while al-Qaeda may have been weakened since the 11 September 2001 attacks, the radical Islamic movement worldwide has strengthened with the formation of new groups and cells who are inspired by Osama Bin Laden, but not under his direct control….

This is the same SecDef who has been quoted in the press as saying that the next person who brought up the “reconstruction” of Iraq to him during the hot war there “will be fired.” He is your minister, Mr. Bush. He is hand in glove with your and your collective obviously erroneous assessment of “staying the course.” The morgues in Baghdad continue to be the most popular place for impromptu get togethers in the city as the last two months saw over 2000 persons murdered in the area, many with signs of torture and still bound…

Your Vice President, Richard Cheney, is not fit to preside over a school board meeting, much less the Senate of the United States of America. His corporate ties are not hidden to anyone; one wonders where his allegiance lies: to the country or his oil corporation cronies?

Your Attorney General, is a talking perversion of our ancient Anglo-Saxon tradition within the Common Law as well as our current statutes. His inverted sense of justice is an outrage. His refusal to hold timely trials or to even establish a system of holding them in accordance of anything resembling a legitimate court of justice — of advocating the basic near-universal rights of a defendent to have access to all evidence both potentially exculpatory and incriminating under the veil of “state secret” is dispicable. He does not deserve to be a member of any bar, much less the AG of the USA.

Mr. Bush, you have ignored pleas for peace and an open administration, driven us into national penury and yet found time for vacation upon vacation. One wonders who actually governs? This writer has little faith in our present Congress, and none at all in your administration. None. For the sake of the country and what dignity we have left, please resign and take Messrs. Cheney, Rumsfeld and Gonzales with you.

In closing sir, your administration currently jangles sabres at the state of the Islamic Republic of Iran. What Iran is doing is what multiple states, even those in this hemisphere is doing, and that is enrich Uranium for the use of power reactors. The very program in which Iran is currently engaged is one begun by President Eisenhower! It lay in stasis for many years, but began again after the aftermath of the Iranian Revolution which ousted the tryant Reza Pahlavi, the soi-disant “Shah.” Those close to your administration claim that Iran is developing enrichment technology in order to produce a nuclear bomb. Reputable researchers from around the world disclaim their ability to assemble any such weapon at their current rate of development for perhaps ten years. The consequences of a war with Iran would be utter disaster for the United States, the neighbors of Iran and the country of Iran. Every analysist knows this. You know this. Why let the sabre-rattling continue? To make us live in fear? To make us into two camps, one that is “terrorist-enabling” (the current opposition party) and one of “patriots and terrorist slayers” (the other major political party)?

No, Mr. Bush, we aren’t afraid. We know your game and it disgusts us. It is time for you to return to Texas. I call upon you to resign or else for the House of Representatives to impeach and the Senate to try you for high crimes and misdomenors. I call for the same actions towards your VP and the cabinet officers identified above.

Mr. Bush and fellow citizens, the government is ours, not Mr. Bush’s and Mr. Cheney’s. The House and Senate represent us and have the power of the purse and oversight and to declare war, not the President. Allow us to close with a reflection on the words of James Madison:

“Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes…known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. . . No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.”


The Public Expression of Religion Act, or How the Right wishes to bankrupt the ACLU

September 12, 2006

 

 

1st Session H. R. 2679

To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to eliminate the chilling effect on the constitutionally protected expression of religion by State and local officials that results from the threat that potential litigants may seek damages and attorney’s fees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

May 26, 2005

Mr. HOSTETTLER (for himself, Mr. WAMP, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. JENKINS, Mr. PAUL, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. SODREL, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. PITTS, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. OTTER, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. POE, and Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


A BILLTo amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to eliminate the chilling effect on the constitutionally protected expression of religion by State and local officials that results from the threat that potential litigants may seek damages and attorney’s fees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005′.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON CERTAIN LAWSUITS AGAINST STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS.

    (a) Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights- Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended–
    • (1) by inserting `(a)’ before the first sentence; and
    • (2) by adding at the end the following:
    `(b) The remedies with respect to a claim under this section where the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion shall be limited to injunctive relief.’.
    (b) Attorneys Fees- Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes of the United States (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following: `However, no fees shall be awarded under this subsection with respect to a claim described in subsection (b) of section nineteen hundred and seventy nine.’.

————————————————————————————————

That is the text of the noxious bill which was just approved by the House Judiciary Committee. Under the aegis of “religous freedom,” the Republican Unenlightened House seeks to undermine all acts of relief from abuses resulting from ignoring the Establishment Clause of the US Constitution.

The purpose of this proposed legislation is simple: to bankrupt the ACLU by making an enjoiner of the award of attorneys fees from any damages awarded by a court in an Establishment case. Injunction alone would be the award of any damages. In other words, one may sue over publicly funded prayer, Ten Commandment monuments, etc. as an individual or a group, but any fees from work on the case would not be awarded as part of the adujication. Once again, let us slip out of legalese:

What this basicly means is that a school in Deepest Darkest Wherever can have prayer in a public school, put an icon of Jesus Christ on the wall, and hire a religious teacher for “Biblical Literacy classes” — all out of the public coffers — and a parent or group of parents seeking relief must hire their own lawyers or handle the case themselves, or else hope and pray (no pun intended) that a civil liberties organization will take their case absolutely pro bono or at a diminished fee. “Winning” such a case would be simply a ruling from the presiding officer of “Now cut that out! Bad! Bad! Bad school! Bad! Bad!”

The number of such cases taken on by the ACLU would be absolutely cut into a fraction of the present number. To compound matters, school boards have been largely supportive of actions that breach Mr. Jefferson’s “wall.” Right wing organizations, such as the VFW, the AFA, and others relish the thought that the ACLU might be ultimately silenced effectively by this legislation.

This will make relief a privledge of the wealthy or the well-connected alone. This must be condemned by the House and never allowed to reach the Senate. But will it? One has to wonder if the last desperate gasps of the Talibangelists is not now being heard. Will it become absolutely pitch dark before the dawn breaks in the United States? This HJC vote is getting but small press, the small nonprofit NewStandard, excepted. Michelle Chen of NewStandard reports on 12 September 2006:

Groups like the ACLU, which represents plaintiffs in many church-state cases, say the attorney-fee awards in successful cases are necessary so that lawyers can offer their services to individuals without charge. Jeremy Leaming, with American United for Separation of Church and State, acknowledged that the bill could affect the group financially, since it has received court-ordered compensation in past cases it has litigated. Nonetheless, he pointed out that the bill does not propose comparable restrictions on attorney’s fees for individuals or groups that sue to defend religious exercise in government or public settings. The main problem, he argued to TNS, is that the bill’s supporters “don’t particularly like the way a lot of federal courts have ruled on church-state issues… and their intention is to see church-state lawsuits stop.”

We see it in a similar light. We urge all who love the freedom of religion in this country to join with us to decry the HJC vote and to preserve our heritage of Messrs. Jefferson and Madison. Two tiered justice is no justice at all. It is Unamerican, repugnant to the spirit of the Constitution, if not the Constitution and precedent themselves, and an agenda attempted to be foisted upon the People by a small group to silence dissent.


Cerebus, having lost two of his heads is dying, himself!

September 4, 2006

Cerebus Eats two of his Heads,

or

How the unholy alliance of Rand’s Ghost Devoured First the Talibangelists, then the Heritage Foundation, Resulting in the Beast’s Death.

Politics makes for strange bedfellows, they say, and this current administration in Washington of late definitely proves that old saws are often more than merely passe. Once Reagan entered the White House, the road to perdition was smoothed and freshly paved by three disparate groups, often with conflicting or neutral views towards one another, yet capable to reach agreement on enough to achieve hegemony over the American political scene. The first group is the unabashed rabid capitalism, the apostles of free trade, the lords of the universe, those lubricated with expensive Scotch whisky and nurtured on petroleum, in short: Ayn Rand’s Ghost.

The next, the Talibangelists, who had not a problem one with laissez-faire economics, but enjoyed the challenge of finding “biblical” reasons to discredit such annoying principles as graduated income taxation, employment security and environmental laws – while finding Heather Has Two Mommies an agent of Satan and sodomy a crime against God and society worthy of death.

The last, which this writer hopes does not conclude the reader to find any evidence of anti-Semitic bias in this essay, we may term the Heritage Foundation for shorthand, only, as there are many, many other groups with whom we lump them, such as the PNAC and the AEI. AIPAC certainly has had many apologists for the rabid anti-everything-not -supportive-of-Israel bunch who throw out the “anti-Semite” charge every time anything that doesn’t smack of a planted article written by Ariel Cohen is printed in a paper in Britain or the US. The charge is so distasteful that it makes serious, dispassionate adult analysis and dissemination of the results all but impossible for a writer to bear. These are the “Terror! Terror! Terror!” mantra repeaters. They see Old Sammy under every bed and wish to bug every phone and wreck nation under nation in order to preserve a self-anointed role as “Big Daddy of the Universe,” from whom all must march in step or become a bug under the sole. Why? Why to make us all free, of course. Even if we have to endure semi-tyranny in the process. In short: Israel and the United States of America, good; UK and Canada, almost good; everyone else in Europe, tolerable; and everyone else evil. Especially countries that dare to be vocal about their rejection of US values. But this crowd does not see individuals, only groups; thus, group punishment is meted out for opposition: terror bombing in cities, cutting off of the trade of medical supplies and other vehicles. To cross them runs one in danger of being labeled either an appeaser of terrorists or else accused of hating the Jewish religion and ethnos or both. Their revolution is as eternal as was Lev Trotsky’s. However, at least Trotsky came down from his soapbox and won a civil war, instead of scribble and screech as do Kristol, Norquist, et al., the first head of Cerebus.

Well, we have the three heads of Cerebus, now we also know some of their names. Talibangelist: Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, as well as anyone who wears a diamond pinkie ring and snake skin boots while allegedly “preaching” on television while begging for money. Their “theology,” if it
deserves the benefit of a greco-derived nomenclature, is diverse, an odd hodgepodge of “born again” ranting and “feel good” old fashioned revival theatrics, with an occasional “healing” or miracle or wind fall of sudden cash thrown in. But that is just good ole’ flim flam. Hokum. Bunk. What is especially troubling about these true believers, these Jacobins of the Pulpit is the supposedly “moral” code they wish to impose upon an Enlightenment nation – a return Leviticus, if one will. They see the old desert tribal superstitions not quaint nor obsolete, but a perfected method of everyday life. This folks, is the Earth is Six Thousand Years Old Crowd, and lucky for us all, Noah was not inspired by EL to put T. Rex on the Ark, or we’d all be dodging dinosaurs today instead of Old Sammy’s airplanes. These are the “defund public education and libraries” crowd – agents of Satan, one knows. These are the “better a coat hanger and an aspirin than the ‘morning after pill’” crowd. We are all too familiar with them, and they have been tossed a bone or two for delivering enough hate to get the uneducated blind semi-literate non-thinking masses to give them votes. They also love guns, this makes the second head of Cerebus especially dangerous.

And then we have the Ghost of Ayn Rand…as the gin-soaked Chris Hitchens late of London once said, her sole redeeming factor was her stringent atheism: the Rumsfelds and Cheneys and Daddy Bushs that reek of Famous Grouse and crude. They are CEOs, people who set “energy policy” behind closed doors, those for whom a nice little war is certainly worth having in the far west of Asia in order to threaten the rapidly depleting oil reserves, thus driving the price ever higher. Their brothers, the old school capitalists, are living a Dickensian fantasy: not even a goose for Tiny Tim’s Christmas table, as Bob Cratchet has lost his job to an outfit in Mumbai. How are we supposed to buy trinkets made in China and wear clothing made in Bangladesh if we clean floors and groom greens for a living? These men – and there are but a few of them women – are producers of nothing except flatulence of the anal and oral varieties. They bravely cheer on the troops to bombs under the streets of Baghdad while dining at Kennebunkport on fresh Maine lobster. They print their signatures on condolence letters. They are the men who read every word from the Vienna School as if it were holy writ. Then they quote holy writ ignoring the overall message of the revealed religions. They are the third head of Cerebus.

The first and second heads slowly consumed by the first – as Stalin warned once, never be part of a troika, as the first and second members will always ally against the third, leaving only one, with which the first then secretly allies with the third’s replacement– leaving only a shill and the first after the second has a care of the mysterious Russian Flu. Sorry, Pat and Ari, Donnie just ate you. Robertson and Cohen are rapidly being relegated to the Lawn Garden of history, as anachronistic as Freud’s “glove paralysis” cases.

Unfortunately, business must go on, and the Carlisle-Boeing-Exxon Group must have its way, there are enemies awaiting, that is to say, Chinese trinkets to be sold and new generations of missiles to test. We must have the bases in Mesopotamia, the Iraqis be damned, what if they really got angry and the oil didn’t just slow down but abruptly end? What if the Baathist message of secular anti-monarchy got out and spread to Saudi Arabia, that would be a fine
pickle, then, wouldn’t it. No, the farce must continue and the Senate debate trivia such as flag burning and how saving the rich from taxes is good for us all and that in order to be free we must become a security state. The Randistas do not care about security, save the securities of the negotiable type. They do not care who plays house. All they want is your money, and if a few thousand here and there from the US need to die, well, then there are intellectual and religious justifications available from Ariel Cohen and Rev. Pat Robertson. Please, do not let the news get out: free trade is what this is all about, the free trade of oil at the highest possible price, with a few stable suppliers. All else is useful rhetoric to justify this.

However, the stumps of the severed heads are bleeding profusely, and save an October Surprise – Old Sammy, anyone? – a severing of the third head is inevitable come November, courtesy of a newly testosterone drenched Democratic Party. And oh, my, there shall be singing in the street when Johnny comes marching home.


Screeching Rats: a Quest for the Regaining of Reason

August 13, 2006

The title, Screeching Rats, comes from a comment I made this August of 2006 regarding the defeat of an ultraconservative candidate in a school board race in the state of Kansas. Not an important election, one might presume, but her tirade against the “liberals” in the Republican Party who shot her candidacy down was what prompted the remark: she was shrill and bitter, to which my reply was, “The rats always screech the loudest and most shrill as the sinking ship’s waters engulf them.”

That is my hope: for the neo-conservative, paleo-fundamentalist anti-Enlightenment antilabor movement will be sunk as deeply as the Titantic. That it will become a mere relic — a fossilized historical curiousity of which much is legend, but ultimately merely an obscure wreck.

This writer sees current U.S. administration as being held hostage to a small group of disparate individuals who have often-competing aims, yet have managed to form a grand coalition. These are the people who worship at the altar of Ayn Rand and Paul Wolfowitz; the people who think there is a reason for the United States to back stab its former ally Iraq in the back and try to foist a “democracy” upon the Iraqi people which is nothing more than a rewording of Mussolini’s fascism. These are the people who toss out phrases such as “terrorist enabler” to describe a candidate who opposes continuation of a military adventure in Iraq and claim that the bright sunny future is merely around the corner, when the Iraqi people suffer random sectarian violence that makes an Orange Day parade in Derry look like an eucumenical picnic in comparison. These are the people who want to restrict our most cherished liberties in order to keep us free. These are the people who want to make conservative fundamentalist Christianity our state religion in all but name and whose eschatology is truly frightening in its implication, the raputurists, the tribulationists, the Dominionists and the “World is six thousand years old” crowd.

Even more frightening, for their present power, per se, and not mere electoral power, are the neo-conservatives: the Trotskyites of conservatism, those for whom “Ayn Rand in one country” is not allowed, rather, permanent war in order to keep the barbarians at bay in order to form a single world of a permanent underclass of ill clothed, underfed and nonmedicated workers who are allowed no dissent under penalty of retribution, that is, the denial of their daily bread given in exchange for their long hours of labor with a permanent uberclass of corporation leaders in charge of them all. This is an Orwellian, Huxleyesque vision of the future with billions of epsilons and two minutes of daily hate for all.

While all these people are frightening in their goals, what distresses me the most is the direction the Democratic Party has turned towards becoming enablers of that lot. A party of Jackson and Jefferson become a party of Miller and Lieberman. A party in which its brightest leaders with some of the largest followings becomes a party of back benchers, silenced by the corporate media, save occasional snipes at Kucinich, Conyers, and Feingold. A party where HR Clinton has been “anointed” the leading candidate yet was hobnobbing with the minions of corporate media power and when a true alternative candidate for her Senate race is running, is unable to have his voice heard.

Our party is sick, but not terminal, unless the status quo continues. It is up to the people to read, and then analyze what they have read along with the votes that are cast and follow the debates. It often seems that the debate has little connection to the vote, as some are willing to say one thing then explain it away when voting the other, coerced by the monied powers of the corporate lobbies. It is a sad day when it takes a lone elderly man hobbling on two canes, hands trembling to denounce the destruction of the Constitution, while dozens of able-bodied men and women do not even grace his presence in the chamber. It is a sad day when claims of necessity and fear of the corporate funds drying up allow only a single senator to vote against the adventure in Iraq and the horrid Patriot Act. It is a sad day when the Senate cannot stop a thug from becoming a federal judge. It is a sad day when there has to be a blog dedicated to this topic.

But in fairness, it is always darkest and coldest before the dawn.